Tiger lion who is bigger

The largest captive tiger on record was a Siberian male called Jaipur. Jaipur was 3. However, this is a bit misleading. Big cats this size are almost certainly overweight. Captive lions and tigers should be kept apart, but accidents or poor practices happen.

The offspring of a male lion and a female tiger is called a liger. The offspring of a male tiger and a female lion is a tigon. The bigger of these two hybrids is the liger.

Because of this, ligers often grow much larger than either of their parents. The largest non-obese liger, Hercules, weighs The existence of hybrids like ligers is controversial. In the past, being bigger would be a good thing for male lions and tigers. They could fight off rivals and win mating rights. Unfortunately, where some see a beautiful animal, others see a trophy.

Both lions and tigers have suffered at the hands of hunters , who sought the biggest prizes. Being bigger also requires more energy. Huge lions and tigers are becoming ever rarer in the wild. Then again, so are small ones. Lions have declined from , to just 20, in the last century.

Tigers are even more endangered with just a few thousand left in the wild. Tiger vs lion size is interesting to know, but more important is appreciating both these animals. What matters is ensuring these majestic creatures still have a place to live in the wild. Going on an African safari is a great chance of seeing lions in their natural habitat. Alex is a freelance writer and author with a penchant for puns and a passion for wildlife of all kinds.

His favourite African animals include lions and gorillas, although the latter didn't fare too well in his book about hypothetical animal combat. You can find more of his animal content on Quora, or his website, Coopeywriting. Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Join us as we celebrate wild Africa , inspiring positive change in the people we reach.

Tiger vs lion size: are tigers bigger than lions? Celebrate Wild Africa With Us! Next Elephant dung — 8 fascinating uses for pachyderm poop. About The Author. The Tiger regularly takes on game that is far larger and stronger than the Lion and does such alone. The Lion requires the help of the pride to take out a large animal. When a Tiger fights, he fights to kill, not just to push aside someone and get better food.

The tiger does not win by intimidation and social challenge, he goes into a fight all or nothing. The lion, being social, tries to win without having to fight if he can and resorts to intimidation, wrestling, and rolling first. He does not get serious from the beginning. In historical accounts where lions and tigers have fought in captivity, the tiger often came out the victor. The most recent account happened on March , where a tiger at the Ankara Zoo attacked a lion through its enclosure and killed the lion with a single paw swipe.

In , a tiger at the Bromwich Zoo broke into the cage of a lion and a fearful scene ensued: the lion's mane saved his head and neck from being injured, but the tiger succeeded in ripping up his stomach, and within a few minutes he was dead.

At the Coney Island Zoo in , a male tiger killed a male lion. If a lion and tiger got into a fight, who would win? While we would much prefer that people focus their thoughts on saving these magnificent animals than on who would win if a lion and tiger fight, the power of these two largest cats seems to raise this question in people's minds. While it would depend on the size, age and aggressiveness of the specific animals involved, generally tigers have a significant advantage.

On average tigers are larger, but more importantly they are more capable of fighting standing on their hind legs. Some people have argued that the male lion's mane offers some advantage in protecting his neck, but this is disputed. Some reports claim that when lions and tigers were pitted against each other in the Coliseum in ancient Rome, the tigers always won. In recent centuries there are almost no opportunities for tigers and lions to cross paths in the wild because tigers are found in Asia while Lions are found in Africa except for a very small population in one area in Asia.

The Tiger often wins. The lion does occasionally win these battles, but rarely. It would not be hands down either of them who could make such a claim? It makes no difference if this is a captive tiger and lion or wild tigers and lions.

When both are captive, they both suffer and benefit from the exact same social pressures. A captive lion might not be able to practice with his brothers, but a captive tiger can't practice hunting and taking down game either. They both have an equal handicap in captivity, and yet the Tiger almost always wins. This would not significantly affect the outcome. A stronger, faster, fiercer opponent is a stronger, faster, fiercer opponent no matter if they are both in a zoo or both in the wild.

Romans would trap and fight wild tigers and lions together and the lion rarely won. Here's some video below to sum up the answer with more than just conjecture Just watch both animals and you tell me, who is the more fierce fighter? Asiatic lions smaller than African lions and tigers both occur in India. Although their ranges no longer overlap, they did once and therefore this was a very real scenario a long time ago.

I am going to specifically answer this in terms of one male tiger going up against one male lion. Although female lions hunt as prides, male lions spend most of their lives alone. They are forced out of the pride when they reach around two years. If they manage to take over a pride of their own they will usually only manage to keep it for a couple of years.

During the time they have a pride, they will spend most of their time fighting off potential usurpers. Lions are the king of the plains. Tigers rule the jungle. But face to face, which would win? Here, their profiles are superimposed:.

Image: Rom-diz. So it seems that the tiger would have a physical advantage over the lion. But it turns out that we have some historical data to add to this conjecture, too.