Which steve jobs movie is better

Key events and characters are introduced out of nowhere and are often forgotten as well. For instance, his entire career with Next?

Anything involving his feud with Bill Gates outside a second phone call? Maybe then it could come somewhat close to finished his legacy. The writing, again, is perfect. The pacing is perfect. But most importantly, nothing feels unfinished here. This makes a surprising, interesting spellbinder of a movie that you would never expect from this film.

Your email address will not be published. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Sign me up to the Movie-Blogger Newsletter. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. Now Trending: Killing the Shepherd Hell or High Seas Go Chase Yourself His Jobs is neither a wide-eyed dreamer nor an on-edge rageaholic, but a man in a perpetual state of paradox.

Where Kutcher is operatic, Fassbender is nakedly sincere. Where Jobs tries to have its cake and eat it too, demanding that we love and hate the man for the exact same reasons, Steve Jobs expects that same love and hatred to enter the fray as a swirl, each one poking through the narrative before ebbing swiftly away to make room for its counterpart. Fassbender has no need for middle grounds. Whether or not Fassbender raises his voice, the rising editing allows his Jobs to build and crescendo in ways that Kutcher was never afforded.

While both start with a young, hip Steve Jobs and end with him old and grey, Jobs takes a more conventional approach, wherein the narrative is meant to encompass the entire time period in between. He has a choice between changing the world and changing himself, constantly caught up in a battle between ego and genius, and the theatre corridors may as well be the recesses of his psyche.

Jobs , on the other hand? If one were to separate fact from fiction completely, Steve Jobs becomes a story of a man at war with his own legacy, about his ruthlessness towards those he loves, and his willingness to make them collateral damage.

Jobs becomes the drawn-out tale of a man lacking platitudes. Throw the facts back in there and things get even more complicated, since the film is part condemnation, poising him as irredeemable, and part hagiography, implying that he was the sole inventor of many of the products in question, instead of an aggregator and remixer of existing tech.

Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic. We delete comments that violate our policy , which we encourage you to read. Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion.

Doc or Sorkinization? Which will be the better Steve Jobs movie? Chris Matyszczyk. July 27, p. The documentary? Or the Sorkinization? More Technically Incorrect KLM flight sways crazily in windy landing Watch this fighter jet's insane vertical takeoff Iran's ayatollah tweets graphic Obama pic.